The author argues that the upheaval of kraevedenie at the beginning of the 1920s and its collapse at the end of the 1930s were directly dependent on Soviet politics in the field of nationalities. It aimed to coordinate the work all over the Soviet Union but mostly failed since it was perceived as Russian. The Russian territory was not marked with national institutions and the Central Bureau of Kraevedenie based in Moscow also tended to represent itself as nonnational. Kraevedenie became a significant vehicle of national mobilization in the Soviet republics and national districts. Organizations of local studies appeared in all national republics and territories and were directly connected to the national institutions. Yet for a majority of kraevedy the interest in the research and representation of locality was considerably tied to the idea of describing the nation. The development of a new discipline and mass movement was grounded on the idea of “krai” (“region”) visibly defined in nonnational terms. The article focuses on the relationship between the Soviet kraevedenie (“regional studies”) of the 1920s–30s and national politics in postrevolutionary Russia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |